Architectural review

ARC Submission

#ARC-2026-1421

Lot 142 · Section 3 · Davidson Homes

Under Review

Elevations

Plan 2845 · Front, Side, Rear (rev. 2)

Approved

Colors & Materials

Brick · Trim · Roof · Garage door

Approved

Site Plan

Setbacks verified · Anti-monotony passed

Pending

Documents

4 PDFs · 18 photos · submitted Apr 28

View packet →
Reviewer: Sarah Mattson · last activity 2 hours ago
01

Submission Workflows

Lot-level and master plan submissions move through Pipsy with multi-step forms, document and photo uploads, version history, and full traceability. Builders submit elevations, color schemes, and site plans through a tabbed portal that handles everything from initial draft to final approved packet - with field-level source labels so reviewers always know where data originated.

ARC repetition map
02

Anti-Monotony & Repetition Mapping

Built-in repetition rules enforce variety across the community based on your project's specific requirements. As builders fill out submission forms, watch "tentacles" extend in every direction across an interactive map - instantly revealing replication patterns and potential conflicts before they become problems.

The rule is now re-run on the server at both submit and approve, so a plan cannot slip through on a stale screen, and overriding a hold is a deliberate act that records who did it and why. Cities that impose their own repetition standards get their own overlay pack, judged on distance and elevation attributes and reported alongside your rules as advisory - so you can see a municipal conflict coming without it quietly blocking your own review.

03

Color & Material Management

Dedicated interfaces let builders submit color selections and materials for developer approval. Maintain community aesthetic standards without the back-and-forth of email chains and spreadsheets.

Saveable Color Schemes

Save and load schemes from nearby lots, then apply them to multiple lots at once. Full CRUD on the scheme library so your palette evolves with the community.

Color Repetition Awareness

When a builder submits a scheme, Pipsy surfaces the schemes already approved on neighboring lots so reviewers spot color clusters before they become a community-wide pattern.

Color & Material Submission

Scheme: Acme Coastal

Lot 142 · Section 3 · Davidson Homes

Under Review

Palette

Brick

Acme Blend #142

Trim

SW Oat Milk

Roof

OC Driftwood

Front Door

SW Naval

Shutters

SW Iron Ore

Garage

SW Modest White

Repetition Check

Brick color clusters detected

Acme Blend #142 is already approved on Lot 138 (3 lots away) and Lot 146 (4 lots away). Inside the 5-lot rule - reviewer can override.

Submitted Apr 28 · saved to scheme library as “Acme Coastal”
04

ARC Control Systems

Full management control for developers to review master plans and individual site submittals. Approve, reject, request revisions, or apply conditional approvals - all with the date stamps, attachments, and history you need to defend every decision.

05

Master Plan Submittals

Complete elevation submission system for builders to upload and manage master plans with full version control. Handles bans by community, classification of standard vs. non-standard plans, and sqft reconciliation across marketing and ARC records.

Master Plan

Davidson Homes

Plan 2845 · The Magnolia

Standard

Elevations (3 of 4 approved)

Elevation A - Craftsman
rev. 3Approved
Elevation B - Traditional
rev. 2Approved
Elevation C - Modern Farmhouse
rev. 4Approved
Elevation D - Tudor
rev. 1Pending

Sqft Reconciliation

ARC

2,845

Marketing

2,845

Variance

match

Community Bans

Not approved for use in Phase 4 Estates

1 banned
7 lots in active build · last submitted Apr 24
06

Fence, Pool & Landscape Requests

The home is approved and built, and then the requests start: a fence on a greenbelt lot, a pool on a corner lot, a landscape plan that touches the trail easement. These have always been the requests that live in email and get decided from memory.

Now each kind has its own real form, and the rules come from the lot itself. Flag a lot as greenbelt, lake, corner, golf, trail, or drainage, and the rules you have written for that flag are enforced at submit - a request that breaks one is refused with your rule quoted back, word for word, beside the field it applies to. Conditions attached to a request gate that request alone, so a pending pool condition never holds the house hostage.

Builders Submit Where They Already Work

A Fence & Pool page in the builder portal, with the same form your reviewers see and the same rules applied before it is ever sent.

One Queue, With The Clock Running

Requests land in a reviewable queue beside everything else, and can seed the inspection template that verifies the work was actually built as approved.

Pool Request

Refused at submit

Lot 44, Block 2 · Sec. 12

greenbelt
Rear setback proposed6 ft

Greenbelt lot rule

“Pool water’s edge shall be no closer than 10 feet to the rear property line on any lot abutting a greenbelt.”

Decking materialBroom-finish concrete
Drainage planAttached
The builder sees the rule before you ever have to send the email.
07

The Approved Record

Years later, someone will ask what was actually approved on a lot, and under which version of the guidelines. Pipsy keeps that answer intact instead of leaving it in a folder.

08

ARC Reporting

A purpose-built reporting layer keeps developers and ARC committees honest about what's actually happening in the community.

09

Lot Fees & The Fee Wallet

Tracking individual checks and wires against individual ARC submissions is one of the most thankless jobs an ARC team has - and it's where money quietly slips through the cracks. Pipsy's Lot Fee Bucket system flips the model: builders prefund a bucket with a single check or wire, and the ARC team draws fees from that bucket as submissions come in.

No more matching a $300 wire to a specific lot submission a week later. No more chasing a builder for the right amount on the right submission. The bucket carries a running balance, every fee application is logged with the lot and submission it belongs to, and the builder gets a clean statement of where their money went.

Builder Bucket

Davidson Homes

Balance

$4,250

Wire received

Apr 12 · Ref #W-7714

+ $10,000

ARC fee - Lot 142, Sec 3

Apr 14 · Submission #4821

− $1,500

Material review - Lot 144

Apr 18 · Submission #4847

− $250

ARC fee - Lot 158, Sec 4

Apr 22 · Submission #4863

− $1,500

Resubmission fee - Lot 142

Apr 26 · Submission #4821

− $500

Color scheme review - Lot 158

Apr 28 · Submission #4863

− $2,000
10

Field Compliance & Inspections

Pipsy's compliance suite extends ARC into the field. Template-based inspections, mobile drive mode with GPS, photo capture per lot, and full builder-corrections workflows turn ARC enforcement from a paper process into a living, auditable system of record.

Field Inspection

Drive Mode

Lot 142 · 2410 Blackberry Ln

29.7604° N

Template

Phase 3 Quarterly · 18 checkpoints

12 / 18 complete

Findings (3)

Trash & debris on lot

Guideline 4.2 · 3 photos

High

Fence posts not stained

Guideline 7.1 · 2 photos

Med

Address signage faded

Guideline 2.4 · 1 photo

Low

Routes to builder

Davidson Homes · Sarah Mattson

on submit →
Inspector: Mark Rodriguez · breadcrumb: 1.4 mi covered
11

Mobile Site Surveying

Purpose-built mobile applications for field teams conducting site surveys and compliance checks, with direct reporting back to the main system. Pipsy turns the truck cab into a full review station - no clipboard, no double entry, no lost forms.

Want to see more?
Call/Text713-487-9683
Email to schedule a demoinfo@pipsy.io